Hey. I like fried squirrel. And I'm adopted so I could be on a date with my half sister and not even know it.
Ответить
Mitch R
No limit shall be imposed on the number of legal weapons I own or the amount of ammunition I choose to keep or I am no longer a free citizen of the USA with the rights and protection of the 2A.
Ответить
Jack Colon
Well at face value GG seems on the "up and up". However"news pundits" are nearly as bad as the late night HACKS Greg bemoans. The rhetoric about OUR DEMOCRACY is frightening to this Republic. The people of America are being programmed by bombardment of dis-information. Ben Franklin reference to"democracy" states it is nothing more than mob rule.
Ответить
Tim Hallas
Owning cars is legal,, but you know that guy who owns 75 of them may be up to no good. Maybe the FBI should go check on him, just to be sure he's not planning to run people over with them.
Ответить
jfrost2005
50 guns are too many let's break it down for hunting alone waterfowl.. pump shot gun, a side by side, a over and under, semi auto, and a semi auto for hard core winter, a backup, one for you r wife, one for your daughter, one for your son who all hunt with you. That's 11 for just waterfowl hunting season. if your families bigger than even more are used.. be careful on the restrictions you throw on numbers everyone is different and has different needs. If we need a gun and use it lawfully who are you to say the number might dictate the need for questioning?
Ответить
Nicole Valiente
Revoking the guns……ok let’s start by the demon democrats and their bodyguards…..I’m sure there’s plenty guns there….right Beto, Pelocy and her cronies. Yes my life is as important as your life . Beto you are careless when you talk like an idiot
Ответить
8aleph
At the present time there are 3 loaded guns in my bedroom. I once worked for a man with over 200 guns he was a collector =.
Ответить
Mark S. McKinney
If I wanted a hundred AR’s and could afford them…thats my business
Ответить
Emanuel G
"Solutions come not from comments armed with emotions but with adults armed with knowledge." Now thats a quote.
he is dead onno is't not it is USA if you do like get out
Ответить
a shep
why would he have 10 guns
Ответить
a shep
in the city cops are not there for you. there to watch make reports
Ответить
a shep
your right they have security's have guns
Ответить
a shep
why does entertainers commits tell us how to live
Ответить
JON SPAULDING
That's why the ones that can afford it have armed bodyguards go figurehow many regular people just to working Joe can afford an armed bodyguard not many
Ответить
neilsthepoet
Greg!!!!
Ответить
j39 91f3r
ive committed no crimes and shouldnt be punished for someone else's.
Ответить
John Eder
You all can thank public schools, and government funded colleges for this.
Ответить
G Buz
There are 54,000 hotels in the US. Secure that!
Ответить
Ed Emmert
They know nothing. Just reach for the attention.
Ответить
misterlyle
Government tracking ownership of firearms is a step toward tyranny. Government controlling which firearms you may own is another step toward tyranny. Government deciding that you may not own firearms is the definition of tyranny, for oppression and suffering will soon follow.
People often mistakenly declare that security measures to protect people in schools or public places are an excessive burden. Reasonable safeguards are not a burden, and their absence never made any sense, and still doesn't. Access to weapons is one example. If you wish to own fifty guns in your personal collection, that is a traditional American right worth protecting. You don't need the freedom to carry them around in your luggage in airports or hotels, however. Restricting that is a reasonable safeguard. School safety is another example. Fences, bulletproof windows and effective door locks are reasonable safeguards that not only protect against violent attacks, but also storms and burglaries. People argue that our schools should not be prisons. A better question is, "Why can't our schools be as safe as a gated community?"
Ответить
Jerson Prieto
I love fried squirrels and share them with my sister.
Ответить
J K
Just arm everyone that is able to own a firearm/firearms
Hey. I like fried squirrel. And I'm adopted so I could be on a date with my half sister and not even know it.
No limit shall be imposed on the number of legal weapons I own or the amount of ammunition I choose to keep or I am no longer a free citizen of the USA with the rights and protection of the 2A.
Well at face value GG seems on the "up and up". However"news pundits" are nearly as bad as the late night HACKS Greg bemoans. The rhetoric about OUR DEMOCRACY is frightening to this Republic. The people of America are being programmed by bombardment of dis-information. Ben Franklin reference to"democracy" states it is nothing more than mob rule.
Owning cars is legal,, but you know that guy who owns 75 of them may be up to no good. Maybe the FBI should go check on him, just to be sure he's not planning to run people over with them.
50 guns are too many let's break it down for hunting alone waterfowl.. pump shot gun, a side by side, a over and under, semi auto, and a semi auto for hard core winter, a backup, one for you r wife, one for your daughter, one for your son who all hunt with you. That's 11 for just waterfowl hunting season. if your families bigger than even more are used.. be careful on the restrictions you throw on numbers everyone is different and has different needs. If we need a gun and use it lawfully who are you to say the number might dictate the need for questioning?
Revoking the guns……ok let’s start by the demon democrats and their bodyguards…..I’m sure there’s plenty guns there….right Beto, Pelocy and her cronies. Yes my life is as important as your life . Beto you are careless when you talk like an idiot
At the present time there are 3 loaded guns in my bedroom. I once worked for a man with over 200 guns he was a collector =.
If I wanted a hundred AR’s and could afford them…thats my business
"Solutions come not from comments armed with emotions but with adults armed with knowledge." Now thats a quote.
0:57 It's the LGBTQIAPK Special Olympics Team.
he is dead onno is't not it is USA if you do like get out
why would he have 10 guns
in the city cops are not there for you. there to watch make reports
your right they have security's have guns
why does entertainers commits tell us how to live
That's why the ones that can afford it have armed bodyguards go figurehow many regular people just to working Joe can afford an armed bodyguard not many
Greg!!!!
ive committed no crimes and shouldnt be punished for someone else's.
You all can thank public schools, and government funded colleges for this.
There are 54,000 hotels in the US. Secure that!
They know nothing. Just reach for the attention.
Government tracking ownership of firearms is a step toward tyranny. Government controlling which firearms you may own is another step toward tyranny. Government deciding that you may not own firearms is the definition of tyranny, for oppression and suffering will soon follow.
People often mistakenly declare that security measures to protect people in schools or public places are an excessive burden. Reasonable safeguards are not a burden, and their absence never made any sense, and still doesn't. Access to weapons is one example. If you wish to own fifty guns in your personal collection, that is a traditional American right worth protecting. You don't need the freedom to carry them around in your luggage in airports or hotels, however. Restricting that is a reasonable safeguard. School safety is another example. Fences, bulletproof windows and effective door locks are reasonable safeguards that not only protect against violent attacks, but also storms and burglaries. People argue that our schools should not be prisons. A better question is, "Why can't our schools be as safe as a gated community?"
I love fried squirrels and share them with my sister.
Just arm everyone that is able to own a firearm/firearms